Mackinac Center Current Comment :: 21 July 2008

<>< Josh Rule : : 2008 MCPP Intern

Isaac Morehouse and Bruce Walker put together today’s Currrent Comment, a celebration of the ideological ties between blues, jazz, and Milton Friedman’s  economics.  Sound a bit far-fetched?  It actually makes perfect sense.  Jazz and blues are all about personal mastery and personal determination.  They hinge on the freedom of the artist to determine what sort of work he will produce.  Similarly, Friedman’s theories required a great deal of personal mastery and personal determination if one wanted to succeed.  They too required freedom for each individual to choose, wisely or poorly, and to set and pursue their own goals and dreams, so long as they did not interfere with another person’s goals and dreams.  So, to celebrate the 96th anniversary of Milton Friedman’s birth, please go put on some Chicago jazz as you read an essay or book by this Chicago defender of human freedom.

If Ludites Owned the Machinery Patents…

-Hannah Mead, MCPP intern, 2008

…we’d still be riding in horse-drawn carriages and wearing homespun, hand-stitched clothing.

Ever since I was a young child I’ve had little respect for the music industry. The RIAA is one of the most backwards organizations I’ve ever encountered. For years they tried to eliminate online music sharing, getting all indignant that young people should violate the law when the incentives were clear: pay $20 for one song, or right-click-save-target-as. Clearly, no amount of cracking down was going to stop the mp3 revolution, but the RIAA stuck to its guns and sought to shut down online music distribution.

Finally Steve Jobs showed them that they could actually embrace and hugely benefit from easier music transfers. The whole thing was like watching someone lead a horse to a pond and hold its big ol’ long face in the water until it finally drank.

Now, the music industry is once again technophobing away, utterly failing to recognize a huge boon when they see it. It’s really hard to tell what’s going on what with the whole thing very bureaucratized, but Pandora, an internet radio service that lets you customize “stations,” may face extinction due to a royalty hike. Maybe Pandora is whining and just seeking what the rate-hike-proponents call a subsidy, I don’t know enough about how this all works to know.

But I do know that Pandora and other customizable internet radio stations going out of business will not help the music industry. As Coyote notes, most of us who listen to Pandora end up buying way more songs we’d never have even heard if internet radio hadn’t introduced us to them. I know I’ve got a good list of about 20 songs I need to buy next time my lappy is in wireless range.

Mackinac Center Current Comment :: 30 July 2008

<>< Josh Rule : : 2008 MCPP Intern

Clicking on today’s Current Comment link from the Mackinac Center homepage redirects readers to the new Michigan Education Digest.  This week’s digest contains five stories highlighting some of the more interesting developments in the world of Michigan public and private education.  Perhaps the most interesting, and disheartening, of this week’s stories highlights a recently released report concluding Michigan to have the lowest graduation rate for black males in the entire country.  In fact, Detroit Public School graduates 1 in 5 of its black males and only 17% of its white males.  Clearly, something is broken in the Detroit Public Schools, and widely embracing school choice is one of the only ways this situation will improve.  Go ahead, though, and read the rest of the stories.

The Bossy City?

-Hannah Mead, MCPP intern, 2008

In a study of the 35 most populous U.S. cities, Reason Magazine reports, “Chicago wins the booby prize for most meddlesome metropolis by a wide margin.” Citing such regulations as bans on guns, smoking and DWOTP (driving while on the phone), Reason supports their hypothesis.

A group of us head off to Chicago later this week for Students for a Free Economy‘s second annual celebration of Milton Friedman’s birthday. I was surprised when people of all stripes started warning me that I can’t smoke in Chicago. I have no interest in smoking and, while I on principle oppose such regulations, I don’t deny I enjoy smoke-free air. (When I moved from Seattle to the Midwest it was such a throwback to hear “smoking or non?” — I hadn’t heard that since I was a small child.)

Howsomever, we nonsmokers have to realize the “first they came for the Jews” nature of these regulations. In a Chicago Tribune piece Mary Schmich argues, “Big cities are like big families—put a lot of people into a small space and somebody has to be charged with the power to say ‘Stop it.’” She [sarcastically?] lists activities that she would like banned because they bother her, such as barbequing with lighter fluid and running air conditioners during the day. For their own safety, she would like to see bicyclists barred from wearing headphones.

Whether she was kidding or not, Ms. Schmich paints a picture of what Reason calls “moral prudery and public health fanaticism” taken to the extreme. Once regulation gets started, there’s no way to stop it. If people can’t drive while talking on a cell phone, why should they be allowed to drive with the radio on? If the city needs surveillance cameras downtown, why shouldn’t they be able to put them inside private establishments? If smoking is banned, why should people be able to eat unhealthy foods? — oh wait, they’re not (Los Angeles, New York City).

So say goodbye to others’ freedoms, and say goodbye to your own. You may think you know better how to run others’ lives, but how many people do you think could run your own life better than you? That’s what I thought.

(Josh discussed the issue of smoking bans in a previous post.)

Mackinac Center Current Comment :: 29 July 2008

<>< Josh Rule : : 2008 MCPP Intern

Today’s Current Comment was written by Jack McHugh.  He writes about the tax climate in Michigan and how increasing the tax burden for an already stumbling economy is a poor idea.  Fundamentally, McHugh reminds readers that economics is the study of people and their decision-making.  So, when the legislators in Michigan’s congress choose to enact higher taxes, businesses who were planning to move into Michigan decide not to come after all.  Families who were barely scraping by before the tax hike simply cannot make it anymore, so they move away.  People are not static objects, but thinking, feeling subjects.  Changing the rules of the game, by increasing taxes for example, changes the very way people play the game itself.  The same old game becomes an entirely new and different game.  But, new may not necessarily mean better.

Another way to communicate this truth is to realize that institutions are important.  Why?  Well, they are important because they can enforce rules and rules are important.  Why?  Well, rules are important because they create incentives, and incentives are important.  Why?  Well, incentives guide people’s behavior, and understanding how people act is the goal of economics.

For the most part, though, the problem is not in the institution itself.  Government, by most people’s account, is a valid institution with a legitimate place in society.  There are problems, though, with the rules.  The current rule set that governs Michigan residents, its current laws, are creating the wrong incentives.  They are, for instance, encouraging people to stay away from Michigan business and even to leave if they are already here.  Economic growth cannot happen this way, no matter how many tax credits are granted to filmmakers or other specialty enterprises.  Instead, these poor rules must be repealed, and different rules must be established to govern the game of Michigan’s economic health.  Remember though, that we might not need as many rules as we have currently.  We need just enough to create the right incentives, and no more.  In fact, creating extra incentives will only serve to make the game less fun for everyone involved.

Michigan needs serious revision to the rules governing the game, and until that happens, situations such as the one outlined by Jack McHugh in his Current Comment will only become more and more depressing.  The solution is simple, even if it may be hard to exercise the restraint to implement.  It is worth it though, for the millions of grateful people who will make Michigan prosper for decades to come.

Mackinac Center Current Comment :: 28 July 2008

<>< Josh Rule : : 2008 MCPP Intern

Jack McHugh writes today’s Current Comment about the proposed Reform Michigan Government Now amendment’s streamlining for Michigan’s budget.  He concludes that the amendment ends up saving the state approximately one-twentieth of one percent of its operating budget.  This amount is almost laughable compared to the hype the proposal has received for its reform and “downsizing” of state government.  McHugh includes further details, as well as his own recommendations, in the Current Comment, so check it out.

Today’s Unintended Consequence no. 1,920,533

~LM Ruhland

Today’s NYT features an article about U.S. problems as a result of foreign fuel subsidies.  From “Fuel Subsidies Overseas Take a Toll on U.S.“:

From Mexico to India to China, governments fearful of inflation and street protests are heavily subsidizing energy prices, particularly for diesel fuel. But the subsidies — estimated at $40 billion this year in China alone — are also removing much of the incentive to conserve fuel.

In most countries that do not subsidize fuel, high prices have caused oil demand to stagnate or fall, as economic theory says they should. But in countries with subsidies, demand is still rising steeply, threatening to outstrip the growth in global supplies.

It’s a good, basic illustration of the global ripples that government interference in the economy can generate.

Algae as fuel

~Lauren Ruhland, MCPP intern

Drew Thornley over at Planet Gore has a really nice examination of algal biofuel today.  A few of the biologists I know say that this will be the only economically and environmentally viable way to make a large-scale shift to ethanol, though the process is still very far from large-scale feasibility.  Unlike processes that divert food resources toward fuel production, algae-to-fuel methods use biomass that’s very energetically cheap to produce and maintain.

On the other hand, the promise of plankton in warding off Malthusian collapse may be exaggerated due to poor disclosure problems.

“You need to be educated (gotta go to school)”

-Hannah Mead, MCPP intern, 2008

The new education budget that passed both chambers removes Detroit Public Schools’ veto power over charter schools. A lot of people are peeved. Rep. Virgil Smith, D-Detroit, claims,

Public school academies have been cherry-picking the good students … (adding to) the death spiral of the Detroit public school system.

This reminds me of a public school teacher who accused me in a “how could you?” tone of having “lowered the lowest common denominator” by being home-schooled. (Irritatingly, her mathematical metaphor has absolutely no applicability to her point — I’m glad I learned math from my mom instead.)

How could I? How could she suggest I ought to have sacrificed myself to somehow “level out” public education? I don’t see how my languishing in public schools for nine hours a day learning nothing* would help, and if I did, I probably wouldn’t have stayed anyway — I rather enjoyed getting my schoolwork done in a couple hours and having the rest of the day to play, tyvm.

Fundamentally, good students leaving a school lowers the average test scores, sure, but that statistic doesn’t mean their leaving hurts the poorer performers. (If anything, according to prevailing school-people wisdom, smaller class sizes would help, as might the ability to focus on a group of students with similar aptitude and difficulties.) The goal of a school should not be to look good statistically — it should be to improve the education of each student.

*I must amend this. In my three years at public school I learned two things: what a cylinder is and that Y is sometimes a vowel.

Mackinac Center Current Comment :: 25 July 2008

<>< Josh Rule : : 2008 MCPP Intern

Today’s Current Comment from the Mackinac Center actually comes from Michigan Education Report.  Vice president of public relations and government affairs for the Michigan Association of Public School Academies Gary Naeyaert writes on the need to remove the special ‘first-class district’ status of Detroit Public Schools.  The distinction forcibly eliminates much of the competition by preventing many private and even charter schools from operating within the district.  Check it out.

About RTW

by Kahryn Rombach, 2008 MCPP Intern

One of the reforms that the MCPP urges be made to Michigan public policy is the enactment of Right to Work (RTW) legislation. RTW prohibits the types of agreements between unions and employers which make union membership (or financial support of the union) a prerequisite to employment with that establishment.

Until the late 1940′s, businesses associated under the National Labor Relations Act struck then-legal “closed shop” agreements in which union membership was a condition of employment for all. Under these arrangements, an employee who left the union for any reason (from refusal to pay dues to involuntary expulsion from the union as a form of punishment) also lost his job, even if he had not violated any of his employer’s rules. Continue reading

I wish my lawn were emo…

-Hannah Mead, MCPP intern, 2008

Let it be understood that I do not advocate violence of any sort except in self-defense and that I think all types of people should be allowed to express the lifestyle they have voluntarily chosen so long as they do not infringe on others’ same rights.

I was intrigued by this Time Magazine article on emo-bashing (HT: Reason’s Hit & Run).

Most of all, however, the assailants target the emos for dressing effeminately, still a provocative act for many in a macho Mexico. “At the core of this is the homophobic issue. The other arguments are just window dressing for that,” said Victor Mendoza, a youth worker in Mexico City. “This is not a battle between music styles at all. It is the conservative side of Mexican society fighting against something different.”

The emos make a soft target for the aggressors. The vast majority are teenagers, often just 15 or 16 years old. Most are from comfortable middle-class backgrounds with little experience of the street battles in Mexico’s hardened barrios. And by its nature, the emo scene attracts followers who prefer intellectual indulgence to fistfights.

[Emph mine]

I’d say the second paragraph contains the real source of the clash. It may be narrow-mindedness and pride in one’s own way of life, but it’s not homophobia. Kids who grew up in truly rough circumstances and learned to toughen up to get through understandably don’t appreciate pampered rich kids moaning about… whatever it is emo kids are emo about.

No one likes a whiner, especially people who face much more difficult situations but who just suck it up and pull through instead of complaining. It is kind of an affront when some people gripe about petty stuff while others face serious dangers daily.* Pity-partyers can’t see the world past the end of their nose. But those who initiate violence against people who spend a good deal of the day attempting to look as hideous as possible are not displaying understanding, either. In beating up the pansies, I hold, thugs are guilty of acting on the very thing that fundamentally irritates them about their victims.

*I do, of course, acknowledge that some folks can have traumatic psychological torments that may or may not be as horrible as threats to one’s physical well-being.

Family fun with S.O.S. Now

~Lauren M. Ruhland, SET intern

As Josh Rule mentioned earlier this month, airline companies are encouraging their customers to pressure their elected representatives for an end to oil speculation.

My father is a frequent flier and was encouraged to fight oil speculation at the Stop Oil Speculation Now (SOS Now) website.  When he gave his ZIP code, the site created the body of a letter automatically addressed to our senators and encouraged the letter-writer to amend the automatically-generated text to suit his needs.  Channeling his past existence as an economics major, he made good use of the text they gave him–with some changes.

I strongly urge your NOT to support of S. 3268 – the Stop Excessive Speculation Act.  This bill accomplishes the most important goal of putting position limits on excessive speculation. is very dangerous and poses a serious and direct threat to our economy.

S. 3268 is also a good first step towards ensuring that formerly “dark” over-the-counter markets are required to do business in the sunshine and to ensure that no one entity unduly controls the market. Any regulatory interference of price signals will lower our standards of living in the long run. Capitalism need pure price signals to drive the actions that meet customer demands. S. 3268 will disrupt price signals, resulting in reduced liquidity and increased transaction costs for users.

I encourage you not to back this bill because it creates a much needed an artificial distinction between legitimate hedgers and those who are in the market for purely speculative purposes, ensuring that traders who have no relationship to the physical product are unable to take advantage of existing loopholes. Another key provision in the bill you should know about closes the “London Loophole”.  It’s critical this loophole be closed to create more transparency and establish reporting requirements which are already required for trading on U.S. exchanges.

I will be watching this issue closely and encouraging my friends to contact their elected officials, too. Thank you for considering my point of view on the critical issue of energy prices and the reforms Congress can enact today regulatory interference that will make a real difference to hardworking Americans and businesses.

The SOS Now website prominently claims that “[r]isky speculation in gas and oil markets is hurting our families.”  My family’s probably an anomaly, but we were all bonding over Dad’s small-scale anti-regulation subversion yesterday night.

We Can Fix That Too!

<>< Josh Rule : : 2008 MCPP Intern

Yesterday, I wrote about the Aerolineas Argentinas, which, although privatized for nearly 20 years, is now being nationalized again.  As I wrote the article, I was thinking to myself, “Why do governments always make the mistake of getting involved in private business?  At least nothing quite so blatant is happening in the U.S. right now.  We are all too focused on the election.”

I stand corrected. Continue reading

Mackinac Center Current Comment :: 24 July 2008

<>< Josh Rule : : 2008 MCPP Intern

Trying Liberty’s Kurt Bouwhuis wrote today’s Current Comment at the Mackinac Center, which is actually a modified version of his previous post, Thoughts of Michigan’s Unemployment Rate.  In it, Bouwhuis shows that the official explanations for Michigan’s high unemployment, an influx of young labor and high gas prices, simply do not hold up under scrutiny.  Instead, he proposes that it is government interventions which are wreaking havoc on Michigan’s economy.