Regulating Systemic Risks

To the Editor:

Peter Wallison masterfully exposes the pitfalls in Rep. Barney Frank’s proposal to create a “systemic risk regulator” (“Congress Is the Real Systemic Risk,” March 17). But it’s worth emphasizing that we already have an excellent regulator of systemic risks: the market. Because participation in any aspect of the market is voluntary, each individual – risking only his or her own assets – chooses how, and how much, to participate. The competition, personal responsibility, and inherent decentralization characteristic of the market keep systemic risks small.

Large systemic risks are created only when competition is replaced by monopoly power, when decentralization is supplanted by centralized decision-making, and when personal responsibility gives way to socialized ‘sharing’of costs and benefits. Government is the one institution capable of achieving this troika of troublesomeness. Monopoly control over the money supply is only the most devious of the countless ways that government dangerously intrudes itself systemically, and with no competition, into market transactions.

Sincerely,

Donald J. Boudreaux

Prosperity Through Destruction?

germany_car_0311German drivers have latched onto a juicy new deal. Under a scheme started in January, car owners who trade in a vehicle more than nine years old for a new, greener model can expect $3,172 from the German government as well as a break from paying road tax for at least a year. Similar “scrapping schemes” have been launched in recent months in France, Italy and Spain. Now motor manufacturers in Britain are pleading with its government to follow suit. ” – Time Magazine

Perhaps they are unfamiliar with Frédéric Bastiat’s Broken Window Fallacy.

Taxed to excess

Dear IRS,

I am sorry to inform you that I will not be able to pay taxes owed April 15, but all is not lost.

I have paid these taxes: accounts receivable tax, building permit tax, CDL tax, cigarette tax, corporate income tax, dog licence tax, federal income tax, unemployment tax, gasoline tax, hunting licence tax, fishing licence tax, waterfowl stamp tax, inheritance tax, inventory tax, liquor tax, luxury tax, medicare tax, city, school and county property tax (up 33 percent last 4 years), real estate tax, social security tax, road usage tax, toll road tax, state and city sales tax, recreational vehicle tax, state franchise tax, state unemployment tax, telephone federal excise tax, telephone federal state and local surcharge tax, telephone minimum usage surcharge tax, telephone state and local tax, utility tax, vehicle licence registration tax, capitol gains tax, lease severance tax, oil and gas assessment tax, Colorado property tax, Texas, Colorado, Wyoming, Oklahoma and New Mexico sales tax, and many more that I can’t recall but I have run out of space and money.

When you do not receive my check April 15, just know that it is an honest mistake. Please treat me the same way you treated Congressmen Charles Rangle, Chris Dodd, Barney Frank and ex-Congressman Tom Dashelle and, of course, your boss Timothy Geithner. No penalties and no interest.

P.S. I will make at least a partial payment as soon as I get my stimulus check.

Ed Barnett

Wichita Falls

CEO Compensation

by Don Boudreaux:

“Editor, Baltimore Sun

Dear Editor:

Because she’s “outraged by the exorbitant sums that are paid to CEOs and to upper management in the United States,” Susan Talbott asks your newspaper “to summarize the salaries and benefits paid to the top 100 CEOs in the nation” (Letters, March 4).  Her reason is that “People need to have facts to be able to protest and effect change.”

If Ms. Talbott has not yet seen these data, then she clearly has reached a conclusion based on mere supposition rather than facts.  If, on the other hand, she HAS seen these data, she likely found them by doing what anyone seeking such information for publicly traded companies can do free of charge: go to the Securities and Exchange Commission’s website.  There’s little reason for you to devote ink and paper to reporting such facts.

Oh, and if Ms. Talbott truly is outraged, she can buy shares of these privately owned companies and then protest executive compensation legitimately, as an owner, rather than cheaply as a non-owning busybody.”