Capitalism, Compassion and Ayn Rand

Say the word “capitalism” in some groups and people will instantly assume that you promote dog-eat-dog greed, corrupt business practices and can’t be bothered to care about the poor.

It is not difficult to figure out why people who do not understand the whole system would think this. Capitalism does have an individualistic focus, but that does not mean that there is no room for giving. One of the most memorable quotes from “Atlas Shrugged” summed up much of Ayn Rand’s philosophy; “I swear by my life and my love of it, that I will never live for the sake of another man, nor ask another man to live for mine.”

Rand was self-focused and did not condone making sacrifices with no benefit. This does not mean, however, that there was no love, compassion or special giving in the world she advocated. Her idealistic characters in “Atlas Shrugged” made a daring raid to secure the safety of a friend, risking their own lives in the process. Although the act appears selfless, these individuals benefited from saving the friend and not needing to suffer the grief of losing him to the looters. Rand takes great pains to show that the individual achievements that her characters profit from also have a positive effect on others. Acting in self interest and making money does not mean that the gains are hoarded. As the business owners became richer, they hired many people to keep the company running at capacity, and invested money into developing newer, better and cheaper products for the consumers. When their businesses were flourishing, everybody won.

To conclude in Rand’s own words, showing that individuals know how to create prosperity better than the government: “America’s abundance was created not by public sacrifices to “the common good,” but by the productive genius of free men who pursued their own personal interests and the making of their own private fortunes. They did not starve the people to pay for America’s industrialization. They gave the people better jobs, higher wages and cheaper goods with each new machine they invented, with every scientific discovery or technological advance – and thus the whole country was moving forward and profiting, not suffering, every step of the way.”

North Korea lifts restrictions on markets…

With the devastating starvation the North Korean people have suffered the government may have finally realized that categorical command-and-control economic planning has been a massive failure.  With this realization, the North Korean government has apparently opened its markets in hopes doing so will curb its food crisis and prevent North Korean citizens from starving.

From the Washington Post:

SEOUL — Bowing to reality, the North Korean government has lifted all restrictions on private markets — a last-resort option for a leadership desperate to prevent its people from starving.

In recent weeks, according to North Korea observers and defector groups with sources in the country, Kim Jong Il’s government admitted its inability to solve the current food shortage and encouraged its people to rely on private markets for the purchase of goods. Though the policy reversal will not alter daily patterns — North Koreans have depended on such markets for more than 15 years — the latest order from Pyongyang abandons a key pillar of a central, planned economy.

Read the rest.

Two Cheers for Capitalism?

Kurt Bouwhuis, Mackinac Center Intern

I attended the Midwest Students for Liberty conference this weekend where I listened to some great lectures.  The last speaker of the conference was Peter Leeson who gave a lecture titled “Two Cheers for Capitalism?”  The following is a couple take aways from his lecture, which is also in a working paper.

1. Unless one prefers poverty, premature death, ignorance, and political oppression to wealth, longevity, knowledge, and freedom, less capitalism deserve no cheers.

2. When people say things like, “It’s still unclear what effect the spread of capitalism throughout the world has had on humanity,” they’re wrong. Similarly, when people say that “markets are important; but we should be restrained in our endorsement of capitalism, as it has harmed as well as helped humanity,” they’re also wrong. Global capitalism’s effect is clear to the point of smacking one in the face: it has made the world unequivocally better off.

Atlas Shrugged 2009

Kurt Bouwhuis, Mackinac Center Intern

I found a website with information regarding the production of a movie based on the book, Atlas Shrugged by Ayn Rand.  Apparently, it is in production and to be released in 2009.

Atlas Shrugged is a novel first published in the United States in 1957.  There is a wiki article that does a great job outlining the contents of the book.  The underlying idea of the book portrays what would happen if the capitalists (entrepreneurs) decided to leave society or stop producing because of the exploitation through taxes and lack of appreciation.  What would happen to society if the greatest minds decided to stop producing?

He Has the Right

<>< Josh Rule : : 2008 MCPP Intern

Yeah, we like capitalism here.  And, we are not ashamed of that.  Markets are good things.  So, let’s hear a little applause for Armin Heinrich, a developer for the iPhone who released a new application at the App Store yesterday.  The program, called I Am Rich is designed to nothing other than illustrate to other that you are indeed rich.  The app costs $999.99 and does nothing other than display a small red, glowing gem on the screen.  Oh wait, there is also an information button that can be clicked to provide a mantra, the secret to staying ” rich, healthy, and successful.”

Folks across the blogosphere are up in arms against Apple and Heinrich for allowing such an application.  Yet, this program illustrates one of the great beauties of capitalism – supply and demand.  Not everyone wants to buy the $1000 application, and nobody is forced to do so.  But, the folks who would like to show off their wealth can do so (or could until Apple pulled the app).  People should, for the most part, be allowed to buy what they would like to buy.  If that is an iPhone application that self-admittedly does little to nothing, so be it.

Thanks to Marginal Revolution for this story.

What’s That You Got Over There by the Fridge?

<>< Josh Rule : : 2008 MCPP Intern

ITM-Power, a UK-based enterprise dedicated to “provid[ing] all aspects of the technology necessary to make the “hydrogen economy” a commercial reality”, has recently announced a product that could place them one step closer to that goal.  Today, they introduced a home refueling station that uses electrolysis to create hydrogen that could be used to power a car, heat a home, cook food, or even power a refridgerator.  ITM-Power plans to have the device, which takes slightly less space than said refridgerator, on the market within two years for under £2000 (about $3947.44 on today’s exchange).

The development should be welcomed for a number of reasons, the most apparent of which is the beginnings of viable competition with an oil-based fuel economy.  In the past, hydrogen has been relegated to the shadows largely because it was unaffordable.  The materials, among which Platinum played an important role, were quite expensive, and the hydrogen itself was difficult to store.  ITM-Power has worked to solve those problems by introducing this new product, which makes no use of Platinum, making hydrogen at roughly 1% of the cost of previous devices.  Further, the station is relatively affordable, and runs off simply water and electricity, so ITM-Power is hoping businesses and individuals will create a decentralized network of fueling stations worldwide.  Although, I suppose only time will tell.  What do you think about hydrogen fuel cells and the call for ridding the world of fossil fuel dependence?  Are they viable products and realistic claims, or the work of idealists and dreamers?  Let us know in the comments below.

eBay Calls for Trading Freedom

The Ebay logo during Ebay Explained 2006 at KLCC, MalaysiaPhoto from liewcf.

<>< Josh Rule : : 2008 MCPP Intern

BBC News just put up an article about eBay’s recent work to open up international trading restrictions, particularly within the European Union.  Current law makes it difficult, if not illegal, to trade goods across international borders as an online vendor.  Accordingly, traditional vendors are working to see these laws enforced to curtail online trading.  They do not want the extra competition deregulated online trading would bring.  eBay, though, has denounced these trading restrictions and promotes a system in which goods can be freely traded online, regardless of either the buyer or the seller’s geographical location. Continue reading

An unexpected question

“How do you feel about capitalism?” a friend asked. I was a bit taken aback. I’m a red-blooded American citizen – how did he think I felt about capitalism? I responded with a solid, Lockean answer: that I believed that whatever a person made with their own toil, sweat, and tears is and ought to be their uncontested property.

 “But what about communism?” he wanted to know. I had to lay aside my conditioned negative reaction to consider the question.

Continue reading