I’ll Be Home for the Holidays… If I Can Afford It

View Flying into Michigan

I love being home for Christmas, and am overjoyed at a chance to be at the Mackinac Center during break. The great, snowy state of Michigan is clearly a fitting place to spend the holidays, but if you need to fly in like I did, you may end up asking, “Can I afford it?”

Though prices often depend on when a passenger buys their tickets, statistics show that the average domestic airfare has gone up from $319 in the highest quarter of 2009 to $355 at the start of 2011. This is not surprising as most airlines are basically bankrupt and need a profit for survival. One of the most commonly cited reasons for this is the volatile price of oil, which comprises nearly 35% of operating costs. Within two years it went from $39 a barrel to $100. Mix that with the bad economy causing fewer people to fly, and most observers could assume they knew the reason for the increases.

Though these factors undoubtedly play big roles, there are additional reasons for air travel problems. For instance, American Airlines recently filed for bankruptcy citing union contracts that cost them$800 million a year more in labor costs than their competitors. The Transport Workers Union (TWU) made their own statement after, fearing that workers would lose their contracts and that airplanes would be less safe. Though workers may be asked to take cuts, this is financially preferable to the company dying altogether. As for safety, any airline which wants to stay afloat will take adequate measures to ensure customer satisfaction, safe service and good publicity without union urging.

Regulations also affect ticket costs. Early on, the prices for commercial flights were high, but in 1978 there was a massive deregulation. According to a study by the Heritage Foundation, it removed government control over fares and lowered ticket prices by almost 40%. It also allowed for the entry of new, cheaper airlines into the market alongside the luxury carriers. Today, the Department of Transportation recently passed new regulations, requiring airlines to reimburse passengers for lost bags, give greater compensation to those bumped from flights and fine any plane which waits on the tarmac for more than three hours. These may be good ideas, but wouldn’t an airline which was seeking to be competitive already try to do these things? If an airline loses my bags I am not going to fly with them again, and they have the price of my future tickets to lose, not just the bag reimbursement. In fact, according to Joshua Mitchell of the Wall Street Journal, the regulations may make things worse, as airlines are three times more likely to cancel flights than wait out the time a little longer on the tarmac. If the fine is applied, the proceeds don’t even go to the passengers, thay go straight to the Department of Transportation.

Environmental regulations are another nightmare for both airlines and passengers. A NCPPR study shows that they contribute significantly to cancellations and delays by inhibiting construction of needed runways. Despite a 25% increase in departures since the 90s, only six new runways were added at major hub airports. A runway which should take two years to build can take ten or more, as airport authorities must obtain a number of permits under federal and state laws regarding environmental concerns. These permits are often further delayed by lawsuits from groups opposed to new construction.

Perhaps the key to enjoying cheaper flights and a more stable airplane industry is just to trust the free market. Freedom – that is what I want to find in my stocking and in my state. Happy Holidays from the Mackinac Center’s interns!

Family fun with S.O.S. Now

~Lauren M. Ruhland, SET intern

As Josh Rule mentioned earlier this month, airline companies are encouraging their customers to pressure their elected representatives for an end to oil speculation.

My father is a frequent flier and was encouraged to fight oil speculation at the Stop Oil Speculation Now (SOS Now) website.  When he gave his ZIP code, the site created the body of a letter automatically addressed to our senators and encouraged the letter-writer to amend the automatically-generated text to suit his needs.  Channeling his past existence as an economics major, he made good use of the text they gave him–with some changes.

I strongly urge your NOT to support of S. 3268 – the Stop Excessive Speculation Act.  This bill accomplishes the most important goal of putting position limits on excessive speculation. is very dangerous and poses a serious and direct threat to our economy.

S. 3268 is also a good first step towards ensuring that formerly “dark” over-the-counter markets are required to do business in the sunshine and to ensure that no one entity unduly controls the market. Any regulatory interference of price signals will lower our standards of living in the long run. Capitalism need pure price signals to drive the actions that meet customer demands. S. 3268 will disrupt price signals, resulting in reduced liquidity and increased transaction costs for users.

I encourage you not to back this bill because it creates a much needed an artificial distinction between legitimate hedgers and those who are in the market for purely speculative purposes, ensuring that traders who have no relationship to the physical product are unable to take advantage of existing loopholes. Another key provision in the bill you should know about closes the “London Loophole”.  It’s critical this loophole be closed to create more transparency and establish reporting requirements which are already required for trading on U.S. exchanges.

I will be watching this issue closely and encouraging my friends to contact their elected officials, too. Thank you for considering my point of view on the critical issue of energy prices and the reforms Congress can enact today regulatory interference that will make a real difference to hardworking Americans and businesses.

The SOS Now website prominently claims that “[r]isky speculation in gas and oil markets is hurting our families.”  My family’s probably an anomaly, but we were all bonding over Dad’s small-scale anti-regulation subversion yesterday night.