NYT on Women in Science & Title IX


~Lauren M. Ruhland, SET intern

Title IX, the federal regulation mandating gender equality in public education, has been subject to controversial interpretations since its inception in 1972.  Most commonly, Title IX debates surrounded funding for women’s athletics programs at the high school and college levels.  Today, John Tierney of the New York Times writes that some would like Title IX intervention in order to establish a stronger feminine presence in the hard sciences:

The members of Congress and women’s groups who have pushed for science to be “Title Nined” say there is evidence that women face discrimination in certain sciences, but the quality of that evidence is disputed. Critics say there is far better research showing that on average, women’s interest in some fields isn’t the same as men’s.

In other words, women aren’t avoiding science because the lab has a prohibitive glass ceiling.  It’s that there are so many other appealing choices out there.  Even as somebody who’s been known to don heels and pearls for an date with D. melanogaster, I’m not counting on spending my career shackled to a lab bench.  Marie Curie, Maria Mitchell, and Rosalind Franklin were able to harness their passions to make groundbreaking scientific discoveries, and for that they should be admired.  However, women who chose to reach for other dreams should not be held up to an ideal they never embraced.

Advertisements

2 thoughts on “NYT on Women in Science & Title IX

  1. But what if these women don’t REALLY know what they want (ie. they are victims of their own oppresson)? Don’t the more “enlightened” leaders of the feminist movement have a responsibility to do everything within their power to encourage the lay-women?

    …anyway, I agree with you 100 percent. That’s why I was forced out of the women’s studies program at school.

  2. Amen, Lauren! My aunt always said I should be an engineer because I’m good at math and women are grossly underrepresented in that field. I, however, was not interested in pursuing that course, and I resented the thought of having my desires subjected to a broader, arbitrary goal chosen by some group. As it turns out, economics is just about as male-dominated, so I guess I’m still shattering glass ceilings. Though I don’t have any chips of glass about me.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s