Burger Battles

~Lauren Ruhland

I’m not often in agreement with my hometown paper’s editorial board, so I have to stop and make a note of it when it happens.  Yesterday, Bay City Times editor John Hiner responded to the Los Angeles city council’s decision to prohibit the opening of new fast food restaurants in one of the city’s most impoverished neighborhoods.  (It’s been referred to as a “fast food ban” in the news, which isn’t really accurate– existing fast food restaurants can continue to operate.)  The justification for the moratorium is the health of poor urban children, who are disproportionately more likely to be obese.

Bay City is separated from L.A. by about 2,300 miles and perhaps an even more impressive cultural gap, but Hiner correctly points out that fast food can include healthy choices, and consumers have only themselves to blame if they’re not picking stuff on the healthier end of the scale.  The editorial doesn’t touch on other criticisms of the L.A. council vote, like the fact that sit-down restaurants and grocery stores aren’t going to magically pop up in low-income, high-crime areas, but it’s nice to see something like this on Sunday morning.


One thought on “Burger Battles

  1. I read about the vote on Friday and was astounded. So, to recover from this terribly patronizing move by the L.A. City Council, I went out to lunch with my family at a greasy, sit-down restaurant, the kind not capped by the council’s vote. It was a nice reminder that simply because you order off a menu while sitting at a booth does not mean that you are necessarily ordering healthier food.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s