Teacher unions don’t care about kids

-Jarrett Skorup

The National Education Association wrapped up their General Assembly recently and people can learn a lot from the event.  I covered in a recent blog post the idea that the NEA cares about control; not students.  As retiring general counsel Bob Chanin explained, “[The] NEA and its affiliates are effective advocates because we have power.”

So what do they do with this power?

Mackinac Center for Public Policy education policy director Michael Van Beek recently wrote about the NEA assembly.  He explains what went on. 

The NEA covered topics including corporate tax reform, “misinformation” about national health care reform, labor rights in Iran, ethnic study programs, same-sex marriage and adult stem cell research.

The NEA has also outlined their support for abortion in the past.  Now, these issues may be interesting; but what exactly do they have to do with education? 

The problem is not with the teachers; its with the bureaucracy and the system as a whole.  The current educational system has tons of regulations, a tenure system that is out of control, and forced-unionization that cripples the system.  The good teachers are caught up in something beyond their control.  But just as its important for parents to remember that the unions aren’t in it for the kids, neither are they necessarily representing teachers well.  As Van Beek reports,

A study of the LM-2 reports for both the NEA and MEA reveals that only 30 percent of their budgets are spent on representation, while almost 60 percent of their expenses go to “overhead” and “administration.” Union members should be aware that only a segment of their dues are used to represent their best interests.

The NEA (and its MEA affiliate) have become systems looking out for themselves.  They are (in effect) supported by dues teachers have no choice but to give them.  This provides them with less incentive to support their members and even less to work for students.  Let’s not pretend otherwise.


One thought on “Teacher unions don’t care about kids

  1. Teaching is an “others” focused profession, and those “others” must be the students. Yet, after entering the classroom I realized that the union had more interest in promoting its non- education agenda than ensuring a quality education for children. I did not like this fact, but what is a teacher to do, especially in a forced- unionism state like California? I found an alternative to the union.

    The Association of American Educators exists to offer teachers all the benefits of a professional organization while making student learning the paramount objective. AAE was founded in 1994 by award-winning educators weary of union focus on issues that had nothing to do with educating students. Today AAE has 40,000 members in all 50 states. Dues are only $15 per month, a fraction of my CA union dues. Check out http://www.aaeteachers.org.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s