A Centrally Planned Birthday Party (It’s Late)

Sunday, June 5, marked 128 years since the birth of economist John Maynard Keynes. Like any good libertarian, I refused to acknowledge it. Then I stumbled across this quote attributed to him, “Capitalism is the astounding belief that the most wickedest of men will do the most wickedest of things for the greatest good of everyone.”

It’s hard to overlook the poor grammar, and I am sure Keynes was not in fact promoting capitalism. Nonetheless, free-market proponents should recognize that Keynes deserves short-term credit, though not long-run praise, for a crafty distortion.

Adam Smith expounds on self-interest in his book “The Theory of Moral Sentiments.” He writes: “In spite of their natural selfishness and rapacity, though they mean only their own conveniency, though the sole end which they propose … be the gratification of their own vain and insatiable desires, they [the rich] divide with the poor the produce of all their improvements. They are led by an invisible hand to make nearly the same distribution of the necessaries of life, which would have been made, had the earth been divided into equal portions among all its inhabitants, and thus without intending it, without knowing it, advance the interest of the society.”

Apparently, Keynes forgot to read Smith’s entire book. Smith pointedly distinguishes between wickedness and selfishness. A major theme of Smith’s book is that in order for a free-market society to work, morality is necessary. Wickedness is a lack of morality, which degrades a society, while selfishness is merely caring for ones’ own needs ahead of others. A society of wicked people is different from a society of self-interested individuals.

If Smith had a chance to wish Keynes a happy birthday, he could heartily congratulate him on being partly right since, as Keynes is thought to have said, “It is better to be roughly right than precisely wrong.”

Happy Birthday, John Maynard Keynes. While celebrating his life and dissenting with his erroneous claims concerning capitalism, we concede that his death did validate his undisputed claim, “In the long run we are all dead.”


One thought on “A Centrally Planned Birthday Party (It’s Late)

  1. Don’t you find Keynes’s “long run” comment just a little morbid? I mean, perhaps from a physical pragmatic standpoint it’s true, but is the pragmatic a complete picture? I’m reminded of Russell Kirk’s reference to Eric Voegelin’s argument that the “division in modern politics… is not between totalitarians on the one hand and liberals (or libertarians) on the other: instead, it lies between all those who believe in a transcendent moral order, on the one side, and on the other side all those who mistake our ephemeral existence as individuals for the be-all and end-all” (Kirk’s words, not mine, from the Politics of Prudence, p. 166-167). Oughtn’t we to contemplate a longer “long run;” the things of Christ? Keynes seems to be making a statement with stale and unsatisfactory spiritual implications. Do we, can we ever, live our lives as if there’s nothing beyond, and we’re all dead?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s