You Can’t Take the Sky from Me…

ImageAfter the death of Ray Bradbury, the Mackinac Center featured an article which mentioned the mythopoeic aspects of his futuristic literature that inspired at least one nerdy intern to further explore the themes of liberty and free market ideals in science fiction. Mythopoeia is a term coined by men like C.S. Lewis and J.R.R. Tolkein, who had a great appreciation for the power of a fantasy. The concept is that, though a myth or story may not be real, there can be real, deep truths within that are better grasped through the illustration than they would be by a direct explanation.

Human rights and freedoms are so fundamental that they are almost inseparable from a good plot. Would Casablanca have lasted this long if Lazslo was evading his taxes instead of the Nazis? Though his taxes may have been unfair, this situation will not give a feeling of gravity as effectively as an army of Nazis will. Still, it is the idea of fighting against an injustice that draws the audience in, because though they are not facing an army, there are situations in their own lives to which it relates and lends lasting inspiration. When it comes to the themes in Science Fiction, there are far too many empires, republics, and anarchies to cover in one article, so grab your blaster and prepare for hyperspace – it’s going to be a long summer of stellar posts!            

Cowboys, explosions, space ships, honor, romance … An unprecedented clashing of genres seamlessly weaves together a celebrated statement of independence in the cult classic TV show Firefly. More than just a single-season pretty face, Captain Mal Reynolds and his crew members embody many of the central tenants of men searching for a free society.

Many businesses earth-side consider moving states to avoid business-crippling regulations, but Captain Reynolds left the earth altogether! After a costly defeat in the Browncoated Rebels’ war of independence, Mal took to the sky without his love, land, or property rights, escaping into space to preserve what little freedom he had left. If this seems extreme, take a look at the policies employed by the Alliance. If every government is arguably coercive, the Alliance is unmistakably so. As he pursues the profitable trading business he used to enjoy on the outskirts of regulation, Mal comes face to face with many underworld ruffians looking to go back on a deal, but the looming danger is always coming meeting with the ever vigilant forms of the Alliance; assassins, bounty hunters and Reavers; aggressive genetic mutations of a government-funded project which has gone horribly wrong.

Though the idea of government is to protect, The Alliance becomes damaging when it refuses to admit the existence of Reavers and resolve that deadly problem they created. It also hurts in smaller ways, such as when it fails to supply medicine to a town that needs it. Mal and his crew, originally hired to steal this precious cargo, change their minds when they realize what it is and give it to the people that need it, with the Captain’s powerful assertion that there “ain’t nothing dishonest about getting’ goods to folk that need ‘em” whether or not it is against the law. 

Looking at the world of Firefly, the places where Serenity’s crew frequent and the deals they make aren’t always safe. In fact, some places are chaotic and downright lawless. Amidst these dangers, the crew always bears their arms, but only for self-defense. Their arms more often come to the aid of those in need, a testament to the ability of a principled man to police himself. Now, this is not to say that the ’verse wouldn’t be better off with some well-chosen and responsibly enforced rules. The problem comes when the Alliance is as violent and corrupt as the thieves, a central issue in Firefly.

This is the environment which prompted the statement, “That’s what the government’s for, to get in a man’s way,” spoken by a disillusioned Mal Reynolds early in the series. Even the more optimistic Shepherd Book, a passenger on the ship, noted the dangers of absolute power, remarking that a government is “a body of people usually-notably-ungoverned.” As Mal begins to regain his faith in mankind and realize that the ‘verse is bigger than him and his crew, he begins to think more about what he can do to limit the power of government vowing that there would be “no more runnin’, I aim to misbehave!”

As citizens of a republic, Michiganders have a political voice in the way Mal never did in our rights to vote, to go to court over injustices, to legally protest and chose who represents us. Therefore we can likely lay our blasters aside in favor of these less hazardous methods. But that does not mean that citizens of this planet shouldn’t always be looking out for the continuation and extension of freedom, and remain informed on the issues which pass through the wilds of the legislature. Hopefully if dedicated citizens each do their duty and keep their ships in order, our government will never become the Alliance – Firefly has already shown us how that would end!





2 thoughts on “You Can’t Take the Sky from Me…

  1. Shelly, I think that is your name. I truly admire your love of freedom. I share that with you, and I am also a fan of Firefly. I am sorry I upset you when I commented on the Mackinac Center about your essay on Friedman. The problem is that I am much older than you, and I lived through WW-II as a child and the later cold war. We live in a society that has created a very complex economic system that just cannot be boiled down to a simple freedom vs. restriction model. You need to study more macroeconomics. I feel that some government regulation of economic activity is necessary to grant economic freedom to the rest of us. But, that is another matter.

    You became a fan of the Mackinac Center, and curiously I was led back to your blog here by my trying to find out how the Mackinac Center was using Facebook to censor the comments that I have been making. Yes, it seems that they are censoring what I have been writing there. I just discovered it. When I add a comment, I can see it, but others signed into Facebook cannot see it. I don’t know how they are working this out. I guess they “defriended” me in a way I can’t understand. I am afraid that the MC has very little commitment to democracy and even less to open discussion of issues. It is quite fascinating in this age of social networking and technology. Technology can be used in ways that suppress open discussion as well as fostering it. Unfortunately, I am not a good enough computer expert to discover how this is being carried out at the moment.

    It is done so surreptitiously that you would never know. So my message to you is. Watch out. Keep up your commitment to freedom and truth. Keep digging to find out the truth about things. Milton Friedman did have a lot of correct things to say about economics, but there are other ways of looking at economics. I would recommend a course in macroeconomics. I am not in this field, but I do like Abel, Bernanke, and Croushore’s textbook. It tries to balance the conservative with the liberal points of view.

    Best wishes,

  2. Have you ever considered about including a little bit more than just your articles?
    I mean, what you say is fundamental and all. But
    think about if you added some great visuals or videos to give your posts more,
    “pop”! Your content is excellent but with images
    and videos, this blog could definitely be one of the
    very best in its niche. Amazing blog!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s